Re: copyright

Steven Bachrach (smb@smb.chem.niu.edu)
Thu, 09 Jul 1998 09:18:01 -0500

Eric Hoffman wrote:
>
> Let me complicate this issue a bit --
>
> Yes, original documents are automatically copyrighted, but who holds that
> copyright? Under current laws, if the document can be consider as a
> "work-for-hire" document, then the employer holds the copyright. More
> precisely, if a faculty member develops a web page for their course, and does
> so on school equipment (and I assume everyone would be posting on the school
> web server, as opposed to a privately owned machine), then NIU has at least
> some claim to copyright on that material.
>
While in theory there MAY be some validity to this, in practice,
univeristies have abrograted their copyright claims. See below.

> Even more complicated -- what happens when a teacher designs a course
> activity in which students create collaborative or individual web documents
> as a component of that course, and they do so on school machines during class
> time, directed by the teacher? As far as I can tell, all three parties (NIU,
> the teacher, and the student) hold some claim to the copyright of those
> documents.
>

I think that it is very important when discussing copyright issues to
not get hung up on the fact that materials are produced/distributed
electronically. All of the complications you wrote of here actually
applied to the univeristy even 15 years ago, if not 100 years ago. For
example, a professor authors a textbook, writes it in his office, uses
the typewriter purchased by the university. He then sells the book to a
publisher. Who gets the royalties? - the author alone, no share to the
university. Who owns the copyright? - the publisher, having had it
transferred from the author, with no input from the university.

Another example, I write an article for a journal. The publisher that
has ME sign a copyright transfer, the univeristy is not a cosigner on
this.

The US givernement has taken a very proactive stance on this - all works
authored by any government employee automatically goes into the public
domain (actually I don't think this applies to congressmen, see Jim
Wright, Newt Gingrich, etc.)

The advent of the web and the potential for distance classes has awoken
the sleeping giant - many universities are now rethinking the ownership
of materials, since they view them as potential revenue streams. But
fundamentally, nothing is really new here - universities could certainly
put restrictions on the copyrights, as most do with patents.

I am part of a focus group, which has made a proposal that national
funding agencies require that authors or universities retain the
copyright of all materials produced under a grant that they fund. This
porposal has been submitted to Science - still waiting on its
publication status.

To get back to the intial question though - ownership of the copyright
is practically defined by whomever acts to protect it, i.e. who brings
the lawsuit agianst the accused violator.

Steve

-- 
Steven Bachrach				
Department of Chemistry
Northern Illinois University
DeKalb, Il 60115			Phone: (815)753-6863
smb@smb.chem.niu.edu			Fax:   (815)753-4802